🔗 Share this article

California Governor Gavin Newsom announced this past Sunday that he is taking legal action against Donald Trump regarding the claimed dispatch of three hundred Californian state guard members to Oregon.

“They are on their way there now,” the governor remarked during a press announcement. “The current federal government is blatantly attacking the legal system directly and putting into action their harmful statements – defying legal directives and treating the judiciary, including those named by the President, as adversaries.”

Judicial Background and Federal Ruling

The governor's legal action is in response to a federal judge’s ruling that prevented the federal government from sending the state guard of Oregon to the city of Portland. US district judge Karin Immergut supported claims that it would inflame rather than reduce conflict in the urban area.

Immergut ruled in her order, which postpones sending the guard until at least 18 October, that there was a insufficient proof that the ongoing rallies in Portland justified the decision.

Local Officials React

The senior deputy attorney, a city attorney, commented that there had been an absence of violent incidents against Ice officers for months and that recent Ice protests were “sedate” in the days before the president described the city to be a battlefield, sometimes including less than twelve participants.

“This isn’t about public safety, the core issue is control,” Governor Newsom said. “This battle will be fought in the courts, but the citizens cannot stay silent in the presence of such irresponsible and autocratic behavior by the nation's leader.”

State Legal Chief Comments

Via a public comment on social media, Oregon attorney general Dan Rayfield stated that the state is reviewing possible actions and preparing to take legal action.

“The administration is evidently hellbent on using the military in American cities, absent facts or justification to do so,” his statement said. “It is up to us and the judicial system to ensure accountability. We are committed to this course.”

National and State Reaction

State guard officials passed on queries to the Department of Defense. A department spokesperson refused to provide a statement. There was no immediate comment from the presidential administration.

National Background

This development from Oregon came just a day after the President authorized the deployment of state guard forces to Chicago, the newest in a succession of comparable interventions across numerous states in the U.S..

Trump had originally declared the proposal on September 27, claiming he was allowing complete use, if necessary” regardless of appeals from Oregon officials and the representatives from the state, who reported there had been a solitary, uneventful rally outside a federal agency location.

Historical Background

Over a long period, Trump has amplified the account that Portland is a conflict-torn city with activists participating in chaos and unlawful behavior.

During his first term in 2020, he sent government agents to the metropolis amid the protests over the killing by officers of George Floyd in another city. The demonstrations expanded across the United States but were especially heightened in Portland. Even with protests against immigration officials being fairly limited in the state currently, the President has used them as a justification to dispatch forces.

Speaking via social media about the new decision from the President, the governor stated: “This is shocking. It’s un-American, and action is needed to halt it.”